Blog

What Could Be Next in the California Legislative Vaccine Front

What Could Be Next in the California Legislative Vaccine Front

Supposedly, the legislative session is going to restart on May 4th. But whenever it continues, I would expect Senator Pan and his allies to clean-up and fix the slippage which resulted from SB 714’s amendment of SB 276, and to take advantage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although there is not a vaccine for the disease right now, there surely will be, in a year to eighteen months as is the general (possibly) optimistic estimate, or maybe even sooner. Because it…

Read More Read More

Some perspective on President Trump’s call for off-label use of Hydroxychloroquine

Some perspective on President Trump’s call for off-label use of Hydroxychloroquine

The President is getting a lot of flak for basically telling COVID-19 patients to try Hydroxychloroquine or as he has put it, “What do you have to lose.” The criticism from the medical establishment is that the drug is not proven safe or effective for COVID-19. That is true, but it’s not the whole story. Most people are or have recently become familiar with the concept of “off label” use, but I suspect few really understand some important aspects of…

Read More Read More

To all you Yahoos who think you have a constitutional right to congregate during a pandemic

To all you Yahoos who think you have a constitutional right to congregate during a pandemic

The short of it is that you don’t. For at least the last few hundred years, the law has recognized the government’s responsibility to protect the public health via its police powers. That job primarily falls to the states under the 10th Amendment, which provides that all powers not expressly granted to the federal government resides in the states. There are many cases where state and the federal government have been allowed to lock-up people considered dangerous to the health,…

Read More Read More

How far can the government go to restrict your movement and the first (idiotic) test case is filed

How far can the government go to restrict your movement and the first (idiotic) test case is filed

People want to know how much can the government really restrict their movements. Can the government really stop healthy people from congregating? I think the short answer to both is yes, at least in the short term, and at least until some court says otherwise, and for reasons I will discuss, I do not see a court overturning a government shelter-in-place order anytime soon. (Ok, maybe that wasn’t such a short answer.) There are both federal and state law issues…

Read More Read More

Being prepared for Government overreach and medical mandates in times like these

Being prepared for Government overreach and medical mandates in times like these

I received the following email, and I thought it was worth responding to in a post. “I hope you and yours are well and staying safe from the viral insanity. I wonder if you have any advice on being prepared for overreach and medical mandates in times like these? I like to have at least a flexible plan. I just finished reading Suzanne Somers’ “Knockout”, and watching Real Stories’ coverage on Stanislaw Burzynski… my cousin is currently seeing Dr Burzynski…

Read More Read More

New Hearing date set in Stoller Case

New Hearing date set in Stoller Case

here is the update: https://gogetfunding.com/blog-single-update/?blogpre=6408571&single=47269 Rick Jaffe, Esq.

Stoller Hearing Adjourned

Stoller Hearing Adjourned

Latest update: https://gogetfunding.com/blog-single-update/?blogpre=6408571&single=47091

Latest Stoller update: judge knocks out 2 witnesses, doesn’t throw out exhibits, yet

Latest Stoller update: judge knocks out 2 witnesses, doesn’t throw out exhibits, yet

here is the latest update https://gogetfunding.com/blog-single-update/?blogpre=6408571&single=47062

Medical Board Claims that “Evidence of Vaccine Safety and Vaccine Safety Data is Irrelevant” to the Stoller Case

Medical Board Claims that “Evidence of Vaccine Safety and Vaccine Safety Data is Irrelevant” to the Stoller Case

from the gogetfund me update, which I couldn’t post from my web site due to something suspicious. Under SB 277, a physician is permitted to issue a medical exemption if she determines that immunization “is not considered safe” for the patient. I confess to perhaps naively thinking that we could defend the Board’s case against Dr. Stoller by showing why he did not consider immunization safe in the 10 patients involved in the Medical Board’s accusation against him. To that…

Read More Read More

Stoller Case Share

Stoller Case Share

Tommorow, the ALJ will tell us whether we get to present evidence justifying ten SB 277 medical exemptions that Ken Stoller issued which stated that immunization was not safe for these children. Yes, it is surprising that we might not be able to present evidence on vaccine safety since vaccine safety (or lack thereof) is the actual statutory basis for writing medical exemptions under SB 277. But maybe special rules apply to cases involving vaccines, or maybe it is the…

Read More Read More