Browsed by
Category: Health Policy

What HHS Should Do About Government Funded Animal Cruelty, Like NOW!

What HHS Should Do About Government Funded Animal Cruelty, Like NOW!

Comments 3 comments

Several months ago, a San Diego health care practitioner started sending me emails with reports of what NIH-funded universities are doing to dogs and cats. I’ve been tied up on other things, (as some of you may know), and I finally spent a few attention units on it. For anyone with pets, and even a lick of empathy, this is appalling and outrageous. Did you know that federal grants pay American research universities to infest beagle puppies with hundreds of…

Read More Read More

Should FDA’s User Fees Be on the Chopping Block?

Should FDA’s User Fees Be on the Chopping Block?

Comments 1 comment

One of the many exciting things that RFK Jr brings to the table is his promise to root out corruption and agency capture. The biggest cause of capture is the revolving door between government and the drug companies. People work for the government and then go back to industry and influence their former subordinates and co-workers, sometimes via the lobby crowd. This has been discussed for decades and there are rules in place. RFK Jr. will strengthen and tighten these…

Read More Read More

Fairly Significant (but not unexpected) update on the Cali Covid Misinformation Wars, But We’re Still Waiting for the Big Enchilada!

Fairly Significant (but not unexpected) update on the Cali Covid Misinformation Wars, But We’re Still Waiting for the Big Enchilada!

Comments 1 comment

Yesterday we had the hearings in the Hoang and Hoeg cases, that being the attorney general’s motion to dismiss both cases on mootness grounds. You will recall that on February 29th, the Ninth Circuit decided that the other two AB 2098 cases were moot and order the district court to dismiss the two cases and also the vacate their decisions, and really just means Judge Slaughter’s ridiculous and pretty ignorant decision indicating that AB 2098 was constitutional. And that was…

Read More Read More

Ivermectin Docs Pummel the FDA at the Fifth Circuit, but there are miles to go before we sleep.

Ivermectin Docs Pummel the FDA at the Fifth Circuit, but there are miles to go before we sleep.

Comments 2 comments

To people supporting the use of Ivermectin and other off-label drugs for Covid, arguably the most galling thing about the mainstream Covid mafia’s PR campaign against Ivermectin was the false and outrageous moniker of it being horse paste. It is false becasue as everyone in the Covid mafia knows, Ivermectin is approved for use in humans. The FDA and promoters of this false moniker obviously intentionally omitted this fact which makes it a bald-face lie. It is outrageous because in…

Read More Read More

The FDA’s Nod to Ivermectin is not an “All’s Clear” for Prescribing it for Covid

The FDA’s Nod to Ivermectin is not an “All’s Clear” for Prescribing it for Covid

Comments 1 comment

Many of you tuned into the recent oral argument in the physicians’ lawsuit against the FDA. The bone of contention? Alleged interference with the practice of medicine due to the FDA’s statements (and tweets) against using Ivermectin for Covid. And who could miss that provocative and heartening recent headline in Epoch Times: “Doctors Can Prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-19: FDA Lawyer”? If you missed it, catch up here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/doctors-can-prescribe-ivermectin-for-covid-19-fda-5456584. Now, to all the doctors who’ve been rubbing their hands in glee,…

Read More Read More

Where are the CDC and Medicare Whistleblowers?

Where are the CDC and Medicare Whistleblowers?

Comments 2 comments

Whistleblowers and smoking guns are the holy grails in impact litigation. They rarely surface, but when they do, they can make a case. I am sort of surprised that there haven’t been more of them since the pandemic. I’ve heard about and interacted with or about a couple of them, but I haven’t found the real deal yet, i.e., someone with current, non-stale compelling information. I have some contacts in Congress. Now that the Republicans are back controlling one house,…

Read More Read More

Join Them Now!

Join Them Now!

Comments 1 comment

(Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Esq. for those of you who are reading this from beyond our solar system.) (PIC’s fearless President, Shira Miller MD outside the Courtroon after the AB 2098 hearing. Editor’s note: She seems pleased and confident, and as turns out, for good reason. Thx Shira for backing this.) (The rest of the legal team and Dr. Verma whose 40-page declaration demonstrated that the “contemporary scientific consensus” was meaningless in this pandemic. Sanjay’s declaration was cited 9 times…

Read More Read More

AB 2098 hearing held yesterday, no result yet, but we are very, very hopeful

AB 2098 hearing held yesterday, no result yet, but we are very, very hopeful

Comments 4 comments

(Man with shades outside Sacramento Federal Courthouse after oral argument in the challenges to AB 2098) We had the hearing on our challenge (and the companion challenge filed by a high-profile Washington D.C. public interest group) yesterday afternoon. It was a very lively event. And because it was me, there were many lighter moments and even some robust laughter with some back-and-forth banter between us and the judge. Not so much with the Attorney General and the judge. And that…

Read More Read More

California Physician Alert: Be Very Careful About What you Say About Covid to New/Prospective Patients

California Physician Alert: Be Very Careful About What you Say About Covid to New/Prospective Patients

Comments 3 comments

As you all know, AB 2098 is, for now, the law of the land in California. Hopefully it won’t be after our preliminary injunction hearing on Monday. I think all physicians should assume that the Cali boards (medical and osteopathic) will try to enforce the law. But there is problem: How are they going to find out who is spreading “Covid misinformation” to their patient? My guess or assumption is that current patients aren’t going to be the ones complaining….

Read More Read More

Paperwork All Filed in our Challenge to AB 2098; Next Up, the Preliminary Injunction Hearing on January 23rd

Paperwork All Filed in our Challenge to AB 2098; Next Up, the Preliminary Injunction Hearing on January 23rd

Comments 0 Comment

I just filed our reply on our preliminary injunction motion. Here it is: Hoang Final Repyfilingcopy I think you will like it. Here are the Attorney General’s response papers to our motion for a preliminary injunction. Our reply responds to these papers. response calderondeclaration limdeclaration requestjudicialnotice Since the elephant that will be in the courtroom on the 23rd will be Judge Slaughter’s decision in the McDonald case denying a preliminary injunction enjoining AB 2098 (now Section 2270 of the Business…

Read More Read More