Bobby Kennedy’s Intro to “Plague of Corruption” is even more important now, after the attacks on the Frontline Doctors and the Firing of Board Certified Physician Dr. Simone Gold
In the future, when they write about how and why the current pharma controlled and corrupted medical paradigm was replaced, I think they will point to the Frontline Doctor’s July 27th press conference, the resulting dismissal of board-certified physician Dr. Simone Gold from her job, and the world-wide public outcry relating to the suppression of information about Hydroxychloroquine by the social media monopolies as the fulcrum point. We are seeing in real-time the dysfunction and failures of the public health apparatus. But we are also seeing how the defenders of the current paradigm wage war against those who question the current medical paradigm, namely the vilification, marginalization, and harassment of the professionals who challenge the church of medical orthodoxy.
A few months ago, Plague of Corruption was published, which is Judy Mikovits’ story about how she was attacked by the medical establishment. Predictably, her book and the documentary about it have been attacked and suppressed. Her book had a forward by Bobby Kennedy.
I’ve been doing this medical maverick stuff for a long, long time, and I have written quite a bit about it, including my own book about some of the mavericks I have defended. But in all that time, and with all my words, I don’t recall ever seeing as cogent and succinct a summary of the perils facing these mavericks as Bobby’s forward to the Mikovits and Heckenlively book. In light of the recent attacks on the Frontline Doctors, it is well worth rereading and sharing Bobby’s words.
(I am only going to share the general parts of his forward. For the entire forward which contains a good summary of Judy’s story, his forward is posted at his group’s (Children’s Health Defense) web site: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/moral-courage-and-our-common-future-a-foreword-to-plague-of-corruption/ .
Bobby and his group of committed activists do great and important work, so if you can, please make a donation to them. Here is the link. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/donate/
The posting of his introduction was on CHD’s web site, published on May 12, 2020.
(I will have a few things to say after his Introduction)
©”Moral Courage and Our Common Future—A Foreword to Plague of Corruption”
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense
“And yet, it moves!” Galileo whispered those defiant words in 1615 as he left the Roman Inquisition tribunal before which he repudiated his theory that the Earth—the immovable center of the Universe according to contemporary orthodoxy—revolves around the sun. Had he not recanted, his life would be forfeit. We like to think of Galileo’s struggles as the quaint artifact of a dark, ignorant, and tyrannical era where individuals challenged government-anointed superstitions only at grave personal risk. Dr. Judy Mikovits’s story shows that stubborn orthodoxies anointed by pharmaceutical companies and corrupt government regulators to protect power and profits remain a dominant force in science and politics.
* * *
[parts about Judy’s case omitted, see the link above for the entire Introduction]
“Challenging contemporary orthodoxies is an occupational hazard
The persecution of scientists and doctors who dare to challenge contemporary orthodoxies did not take a rest after Galileo: it has always been, and remains today, an occupational hazard. Henrik Ibsen’s 1882 play An Enemy of the People is a parable for the pitfall of scientific integrity. Ibsen tells the story of a doctor in southern Norway who discovers that his town’s popular and lucrative public baths were actually sickening the visitors who flocked to them for rejuvenation. Discharges from local tanneries had infected the spas with lethal bacteria. When the doctor goes public with the information, local merchants, joined by government officials, their allies in the “liberal-minded independent press,” and other financially interested parties move to muzzle him. The medical establishment pulls his medical license, the townsfolk vilify and brand him “an enemy of the people.”
Ibsen’s fictional doctor experienced what social scientists call the “Semmelweis reflex.” This term describes the knee-jerk revulsion with which the press, the medical and scientific community, and allied financial interests greet new scientific evidence that contradicts an established scientific paradigm. The reflex can be particularly fierce in cases where new scientific information suggests that established medical practices are actually harming public health.
The real-life plight of Ignaz Semmelweis, a Hungarian physician, inspired the term and Ibsen’s play. In 1847, Dr. Semmelweis was an assistant professor at Vienna’s General Hospital maternity clinic, where around 10 percent of women died from puerperal “birth bed” fever. Based on his pet theory that cleanliness could mitigate transmission of disease-causing “particles,” Semmelweis introduced the practice of mandatory hand washing for interns between performing autopsies and delivering babies. The rate of fatal puerperal fever immediately dropped to around 1 percent. Semmelweis published these findings.
Rather than building a statue to Semmelweis, the medical community, unwilling to admit culpability in the injury of so many patients, expelled the doctor from the medical profession. His former colleagues tricked Dr. Semmelweis into visiting a mental institution in 1865, then committed him against his will. Semmelweis died mysteriously two weeks later. A decade afterward, Louis Pasteur’s germ theory and Joseph Lister’s work on hospital sanitation vindicated Semmelweis’s ideas.
Modern analogs abound
Modern analogs abound. Herbert Needleman of the University of Pittsburgh endured the Semmelweis reflex when he revealed the brain-killing toxicity of lead in the 1980s. Needleman published a groundbreaking study in 1979 in the New England Journal of Medicine showing that children with high levels of lead in their teeth scored significantly lower than their peers on intelligence tests, on auditory and speech processing, and on attention measurements. Beginning in the early 1980s, the lead and oil industries (leaded gasoline was a lucrative petroleum product) mobilized public relations firms and scientific and medical consultants to lambast Needleman’s research and his credibility. Industry pressured the Environmental Protection Agency, the Office of Scientific Integrity at the National Institutes of Health, and the University of Pittsburgh to launch investigations against Needleman. Ultimately the federal government and the University vindicated Needleman. But the impact of the industry’s scathing assault ruined Needleman’s academic career and stagnated the field of lead research. The episode offered an enduring demonstration of industry power to disrupt the lives of researchers who dare to question their products’ safety.
Trade journals and the popular media disparaged [Rachel Carson] as a ‘hysterical woman.’
Rachel Carson ran the same gauntlet in the early 1960s when she exposed the dangers of Monsanto’s DDT pesticide, which the medical community then promoted as prophylactic against body lice and malaria. Government officials and medical professionals led by the American Medical Association joined Monsanto and other chemical manufacturers, attacking Carson viciously. Trade journals and the popular media disparaged her as a “hysterical woman.” Industry talking points derided Carson as a “spinster,” the contemporary euphemism for lesbian, and for being unscientific. Vicious criticisms of her book appeared in editorial pages in Time, Life, Newsweek, the Saturday Evening Post, US News and World Report, and even Sports Illustrated. I am immensely proud that my uncle, President John F. Kennedy, played a critical role in vindicating Carson. In 1962, he defied his own USDA, a captive agency in league with Monsanto, and appointed a panel of independent scientists who validated every material assertion in Carson’s book Silent Spring.
The experience of British physician and epidemiologist Alice Stewart offers a near-perfect analogy to the Medical cartel’s lynching of Judy Mikovits. In the 1940s, Stewart was one of the rare women in her profession and the youngest fellow ever elected at the time to the Royal College of Physicians. She began investigating the high occurrences of childhood cancers in well-to-do families, a puzzling phenomenon given that disease often correlated with poverty, and seldom with affluence. Stewart published a paper in The Lancet in 1956 offering strong evidence that the common practice of giving X-rays to pregnant women was the culprit in carcinomas that would later afflict their children. According to Margaret Heffernan, author of Willful Blindness, Stewart’s finding “flew in the face of conventional wisdom”—the medical profession’s enthusiasm for the new technology of X-rays—as well as “doctors’ idea of themselves, which was as people who helped patients.” A coalition of government regulators, nuclear promoters, and the nuclear industry joined the US and British medical establishments in launching a brutal attack on Stewart. Stewart, who died in 2002 at the age of ninety-five, never again received another major research grant in England. It took twenty-five years after the publication of Stewart’s paper for the medical establishment to finally acknowledge her findings and abandon the practice of X-raying expectant mothers.
Punished, exiled, and ruined
Judy Mikovits is heir to these martyrs and, more directly, to a long line of scientists, whom public health officials have punished, exiled, and ruined specifically for committing heresy against reigning vaccine orthodoxies.
Dr. Bernice Eddy was an award-winning virologist, and one of the highest-ranking female scientists in NIH history. She and her research partner Elizabeth Stewart were the first researchers to isolate the Polyomavirus—the first virus proven to cause cancer. In 1954, NIH asked Eddy to direct testing of the Salk polio vaccine. She discovered, while testing eighteen macaques, that Salk’s vaccine contained residual live polio virus that was paralyzing the monkeys. Dr. Eddy warned her NIH bosses that the vaccine was virulent, but they dismissed her concerns. The distribution of that vaccine by Cutter Labs in California caused the worst polio outbreak in history. Health officials infected 200,000 people with live polio; 70,000 became sick, leaving 200 children paralyzed and ten dead.
In 1961, Eddy discovered that a cancer-causing monkey virus, SV40, had contaminated ninety-eight million Salk polio vaccines. When she injected the SV40 virus into newborn hamsters, the rodents sprouted tumors. Eddy’s discovery proved an embarrassment to many scientists working on the vaccine. Instead of rewarding her for her visionary work, NIH officials banned her from polio research and assigned her to other duties. The NIH buried the alarming information and continued using the vaccines.
In the autumn of 1960, the New York Cancer Society invited Eddy to address its annual conference. Eddy chose the subject of tumors induced by the polyoma virus. However, she also described tumors induced by the SV40 viral agent in monkey kidney cells. Her NIH supervisor angrily reprimanded Eddy for mentioning the discovery publicly and banned her from public health crisis statements. Eddy argued for publication of her work on the virus, casting the contaminated vaccine supply on an urgent public health crisis. Agency bigwigs stonewalled publication, allowing Merck and Parke-Davis to continue marketing the oncogenic vaccine to millions of American adults and children.
On July 26, 1961, the New York Times reported that Merck and Parke-Davis were withdrawing their Salk vaccines. The article said nothing about cancer. The Times ran the story next to an account about overdue library fines on page 33.
While two drug companies, Merck and Parke-Davis, recalled their polio vaccine in 1961, NIH officials refused to pursue a total recall of the rest of the supply, fearing reputational injury to the vaccine program if Americans learned that PHS had infected them with a cancer-producing virus. As a result, millions of unsuspecting Americans received carcinogenic vaccines between 1961 and 1963. The Public Health Service then concealed that “secret” for forty years.
In total, ninety-eight million Americans received shots potentially containing the cancer-producing virus, which is now part of the human genome. In 1996, government researchers identified SV-40 in 23 percent of the blood specimens and 45 percent of the sperm specimens collected from healthy adults. Six percent of the children born between 1980 and 1995 are infected. Public health officials gave millions of people the vaccine for years after they knew it was infected. They contaminated humanity with a monkey virus and refused to admit what they’d done.
Today, scientists find SV-40 in a wide range of deadly tumors, including between 33 percent and 90 percent of brain tumors, eight of eight ependymomas, and nearly half of the bone tumors tested.
Today, SV-40 is used in research laboratories throughout the world because it is so reliably carcinogenic. Researchers use it to produce a wide variety of bone and soft-tissue cancers including mesothelioma and brain tumors in animals. These cancers have exploded in the baby boom generation, which received the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines between 1955 and 1963. Skin cancers are up by 70 percent, lymphoma and prostate by 66 percent, and brain cancer by 34 percent. Prior to 1950, mesothelioma was rare in humans. Today, doctors diagnose nearly 3,000 Americans with mesotheliomas every year; 60 percent of the tumors that were tested contained SV-40. Today, scientists find SV-40 in a wide range of deadly tumors, including between 33 percent and 90 percent of brain tumors, eight of eight ependymomas, and nearly half of the bone tumors tested.
In successive measures, NIH forbade Bernice Eddy from speaking publicly or attending scholarly conferences, held up her papers, removed her from vaccine research altogether, and eventually destroyed her animals and took away access to her labs. Her treatment continues to mark an enduring scandal with the scientific community, yet NIH’s Bernice Eddy playbook has become a standardized template for Federal vaccine regulators in their treatment of dissident vaccine scientists who seek to tell the truth about vaccines.
Dr. John Anthony Morris was a bacteriologist and virologist who worked for thirty-six years at NIH and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), beginning in 1940. Morris served as the chief vaccine officer for the Bureau of Biological Standards (BBS) at the National Institute of Health and later with the FDA when the BBS transferred to that agency in the 1970s. Dr. Morris irked his superiors by arguing that the research carried out by his unit demonstrated there was no reliable proof that flu vaccines were effective in preventing influenza; in particular, he accused his supervisor of basing HHS’s mass vaccination program for the swine flu primarily on a scientifically baseless fear campaign and on false claims made by pharmaceutical manufacturers. He warned that the vaccine was dangerous and could induce neurological injuries. His CDC superior warned Dr. Morris, “I would advise you not to talk about this.”
When vaccine recipients began reporting adverse reactions, including Guillain-Barré, Dr. Morris disobeyed that order and went public. He declared that the flu vaccine was ineffective and potentially dangerous and said that he could find no evidence that this swine flu was dangerous or that it would spread from human to human.
In retaliation, FDA officials confiscated his research materials, changed the locks on his laboratory, reassigned his laboratory staff, and blocked his efforts to publish his findings. The FDA assigned Dr. Morris to a small room with no telephone. Anyone who wished to see him had to secure permission from the chief of the lab. In 1976, HHS fired Dr. Morris on the pretext that he failed to return library books on time.
Among the vaccine’s victims were 500 cases of Guillain-Barré, including 200 people paralyzed and thirty-three dead.
Subsequent events supported Dr. Morris’s skepticism about the swine flu shot. The 1976 swine flu vaccination program was so fraught with problems that the government discontinued inoculations after forty-nine million people had received the vaccine. Among the vaccine’s victims were 500 cases of Guillain-Barré, including 200 people paralyzed and thirty-three dead. Furthermore, the incidence of swine flu among vaccinated was seven times greater than among those who were unvaccinated, according to news reports.
According to his New York Times obituary, Dr. Morris said, “The producers of these (influenza) vaccines know they are worthless, but they go on selling them anyway.” He told the Washington Post in 1979, “It’s a medical ripoff I believe the public should have truthful information on the basis of which they can determine whether or not to take the vaccine,” adding, “I believe that given full information, they won’t take the vaccine.”
FDA used the same playbook in 2002 to isolate, silence, and drive from government service its star epidemiologist, Dr. Bart Classen, when his massive epidemiologic studies, the largest ever performed, linked Hib vaccines to the juvenile diabetes epidemic. FDA ordered Dr. Classen to refrain from publishing the government-funded studies, forbade him from talking publicly about the alarming outbreak, and eventually forced him out of government service.
In 1995, the CDC hired a PhD computer analytics expert, Dr. Gary Goldman, to perform the largest-ever CDC-funded study of the chickenpox vaccine. Goldman’s results on an isolated population of 300,000 residents of Antelope Valley, California, showed that the vaccine waned, leading to dangerous outbreaks of chickenpox in adults and that ten-year-old children who received the vaccine were getting shingles at over three times the rate of unvaccinated children. Shingles has twenty times the death rate of chickenpox and causes blindness. CDC ordered Goldman to hide his findings and forbade him from publishing his data. In 2002, Goldman resigned in protest. He sent a letter to his bosses saying that he was resigning because “I refuse to participate in research fraud.”
Our corrupt medical officials have systematically disgraced and silenced them.
Recent medical history overflows with other examples of the brutal suppression of any science that exposes vaccines’ risks; its casualties include brilliant and compassionate doctors and scientists like Dr. Waney Squier, the railroaded British gastroenterologist Andy Wakefield, the steadfast father/ son research team David and Dr. Mark Geier, Italian biochemist Antionetta Gatti, and Danish epidimiologist Peter Goetzsche. Any just society would have built statues to these visionaries and honored them with laurels and leadership. Our corrupt medical officials have systematically disgraced and silenced them.
In England a neuropathologist, Dr. Waney Squier of the Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, testified in a series of cases on behalf of defendants accused of inflicting shaken baby syndrome. Squier believed that, in these cases, vaccines and not physical trauma had caused the infants’ brain injuries. In March 2016, the Medical Practitioner’s Tribunal Service (MPTS) charged her with falsifying evidence and lying and struck her from the medical register. Squier appealed the tribunal’s decision in November 2016. The High Court of England reversed the MPTS’s decision, concluding, “The determination of the MPTS is in many significant ways flawed.”
Professor Peter Gøtzsche co-founded the Cochrane Collaboration in 1993 to remedy the overwhelming corruption of published science and scientists by pharmaceutical companies. Over 30,000 of the world’s leading scientists joined Cochrane as volunteer reviewers hoping to restore independence and integrity to published science. Gøtzsche was responsible for making Cochrane the world’s leading independent research institute. He also founded the Nordic Cochrane Center in 2003. On October 29, 2018, pharmaceutical interests, led by Bill Gates, finally succeeded in ousting Professor Gøtzsche. A stacked board controlled by Gates fired Gøtzsche from the Cochrane Collaboration after he published a well-founded criticism of the HPV vaccine. In 2018, the Danish government, under pressure from pharma, fired Peter Gøtzsche from Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen. His findings about the HPV vaccine threatened the pharmaceutical industry’s earnings.
A search for existential truth
Science, at its best, is a search for existential truth. Sometimes, however, those truths threaten powerful economic paradigms. Both science and democracy rely on the free flow of accurate information. Greedy corporations and captive government regulators have consistently shown themselves willing to twist, distort, falsify, and corrupt science, hide information, and censor open debate to protect personal power and corporate profits. Censorship is the fatal enemy of both democracy and public health. Dr. Frank Ruscetti often quotes Valery Legasov, the courageous Russian physicist who braved censor, torture, and threats on his life by the KGB to reveal to the world the true cause of the Chernobyl disaster. “To be a scientist is to be naïve. We are so focused on our search for the truth, we fail to consider how few actually want us to find it. But it is always there, whether we can see it or not, whether we choose to or not. The truth doesn’t care about our needs or our wants. It doesn’t care about our governments, our ideologies, our religions. It will lie in wait for all time.”
This account by Judy Mikovits and Kent Heckenlively is vitally important both to the health of our children and the vitality of our democracy. My father believed moral courage to be the rarest species of bravery. Rarer even than the physical courage of soldiers in battle or great intelligence. He thought it the one vital quality required to salvage the world.
If we are to continue to enjoy democracy and protect our children from the forces that seek to commoditize humanity, then we need courageous scientists like Judy Mikovits who are willing to speak truth to power, even at terrible personal cost.”
That’s his forward, and it is even more relevant now with the latest attack on clinicians whose crime is that they are speaking out about a treatment they are using which is working to save lives. Bobby’s forward is as good as it gets, so please reshare. Here it is again: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/moral-courage-and-our-common-future-a-foreword-to-plague-of-corruption/
AND LET ME BE CLEAR
I am not advocating that you should take this drug if you get COVID-19 or if you want to prevent it. I don’t think anyone knows for sure how effective it is and/or in what subset of patients it may work or work best in. But I am very sure that because it is an FDA approved drug which has been in widespread use for decades, a licensed physician has the right to prescribe it off-label if, in the physician’s judgment, the potential benefits outweigh the risks for a given patient, so long as there is proper informed consent.
Of course, some state government authorities are trying to interfere with that right, but that should be resisted by the public, because it should be each patient’s right to decide on which FDA approved treatment that patient should receive, in consultation with her physician. That is one of the bedrock principles of modern medicine, or at least it used to be.
How the change is going to happen
Like all paradigm shifts, this one is and will continue to be bumpy, and there are always casualties, like the attacked and discredited scientists who are later vindicated.
There have been and will continue to be some lawsuits, but lawsuits will not be a significant part of this, due to the judiciary’s inherent conservative nature and institutional bias.
Standard social media may help somewhat, despite its attempt to suppress the message of these mavericks. However, I think the change will ultimately happen because of workarounds created by innovators who will better serve the large swaths of people who just are not buying what is being fed to them. There is a physics to the demand for information; The unmet demand for information will be satisfied by the marketplace, probably by what comes next after Facebook.
In the meantime, keep organizing, share the opinions of the frontline physicians using this and natural treatments (and prophylactics like Vitamin D) with the local and state authorities, listen to and share the opinions of thought-leader advocates like Bobby K, watch for the innovators and help them make what’s next, next, and most importantly, keep the pressure on!
Rick Jaffe, Esq.
3 thoughts on “Bobby Kennedy’s Intro to “Plague of Corruption” is even more important now, after the attacks on the Frontline Doctors and the Firing of Board Certified Physician Dr. Simone Gold”
I guess my heart and soul does not belong to me? I want to decide my future, not a money grubbing corporation making MY decisions! Anyone involved in condoning forced vaccinations has blood on their hands.
I received the following email criticizing my spread of misinformation about Judy Mikovits. I thought it contained a good article about the other side of the issue, and it was important information, so I wrote a post about the commentary. to present the other side. You can check my recent posts.
Here is the email I received with the links to that and a couple other links referenced therein.
“Dear Mr. Jaffe,
I am appalled that you are supporting Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Judy Mikovits in anti-vaccine propaganda and pseudoscience. Here is my evidence of my former boss’ lies: I worked for Mikovits and was identified in her first 2014 book on pg 23/42. http://bit.ly/3f8hNRa Here is the affidavit by Max Pfost stating that he stole company property as directed by Mikovits in 2011:
This led to an arrest warrant. A second affidavit by Amanda McKenzie stated that Mikovits directed her to steal a cell line, but McKenzie refused. Mikovits already lost a civil lawsuit against WPI in 2012 for her theft.
Virologists explain how Mikovits deliberately spiked CFS patient samples with the XMRV retrovirus, evidence of scientific fraud:
Stop spreading medical information that is exacerbating the COVID-19 pandemic!
THE PLACE THAT SCIENCE DEBATE IS RESOLVED IS IN PEER-REVIEWED JOURNALS. IF A STUDY IS PUBLISHED THAT FOLLOWS BAD PROCEDURES THEN IT GENERATES A DEBATE AND IN SOME CASES MAY BE WITHDRAWN.
THERE IS NO PLACE IN SCIENCE FOR PERSECUTION, ATTACKS, AND RUINING A SCIENTIST NOT TO MENTION JAILING A SCIENTIST WITHOUT CHARGES.
ONCE ALL THESE MEASURES OF PERSECUTION WERE TAKEN, BIG PHARMA AND GATES WHO OWNS IT, GAVE UP THE RIGHT TO CRITICIZE MIKOVITZ. NO ARGUMENT WORKS BECAUSE IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER SHE WAS NEGLIGENT OF NOT, SHE WAS ATTACKED IN MANY NEFARIOUS AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL WAYS AND THAT SHE MADE A MISTAKE OR USED BAD SCIENCE IS NO LONGER A PERMISSIBLE DEBATE.
PROVING A WHISTLEBLOWER WRONG SHOULD NEVER BECOME THE NORM. ONCE A SCIENTIST WHISTLEBLOWER IS ATTACKED IT DOESN’T MATTER IF SHE KILLS BABIES (FOR DRAMATIC EMPHASIS) THE ACCUSER/ATTACKER IS ALWAYS WRONG.
THIS DISCUSSION IS NOT ABOUT WHETHER MIKOVITZ WAS RIGHT OR WRONG, IT’S NOW ABOUT HOW CAN THE AMERICAN PUBLIC ALLOW IT TO STAND.