Update on Dr. Stoller’s Lawsuit against the San Francisco City Attorney
The San Francisco City Attorney’s Office has not yet filed an answer to Dr. Stoller’s lawsuit. (It will do so in the next week or two.) And still no separate lawsuit to compel compliance with his administrative subpoena, which is what I was expecting, but I think it may still be coming.
The discovery phase of most civil cases does not start until after the defendant answers the complaint. However, there is a way to start discovery sooner, and that is what I have done. Specifically, I have requested that the City Attorney’s Office provide all communications between his office and Senator’s Pan’s office, the Medical Board, and a certain law professor who seems to think that nuisance lawsuits against the families of unvaccinated children is a good idea. The City Attorney has 30 days to submit a response to our request. Sometimes civil litigation is about as exciting as watching paint dry. Sometimes it’s not.
On the SB 276 Front
Yesterday, a slightly revised version of the bill was dropped. I haven’t had the chance to look it over, but at this point, I wouldn’t expect any major concessions. If there is anything significant, I will follow-up. This is shaping-up to be a party-line issue, which is disappointing.
I keep hearing how much Senator Dr. Pan profits from his vaccine giving, and how he is in the pocket of pharma, but it seems like it is all just unsupported speculation, extrapolation and/or generalization.
Now if there was actual evidence of his personal connection to pharma, and I mean a document which shows that he is doing what he’s doing in order to advance Pharma’s interest, at the expense of his patients or children in general, or a document with his name on it which shows some unsavory action, that would be entirely different.
So, if there is a smoking gun out there, now would be a good time for it to surface. If not, then all the unsupported or generalized chatter about Senator’s Pan’s conflict of interest because he makes money from administering vaccines (as all pediatricians do) is really just feel-good preaching to the choir and will not change the mind of democrats toeing the party line. It also furthers the narrative about vaccine misinformation being spread by opponents of SB 276 and the vaccine concerned community in general. This is fueling social media and commerce sites efforts to limit your access to the internet. Regrettably, that puts you between a rock and a hard place. So it is something to consider.
Rick Jaffe, Esq.
7 thoughts on “Update on Dr. Stoller’s Lawsuit against the San Francisco City Attorney”
What about videos of his pharma handler whispering answers in his ear when he is questioned by legislators?
Great discovery action. Can’t wait to see what unfolds!
What about this?
Politicians receiving campaign contributions from industry, really??? That’s the American way, for better but mostly for worse.
Does Pan face any sanction for lying? He tells whopper after whopper. It seems he is sloppy.
old news, and legislators have absolute immunity on what they say in the legislature. He’s got his point of view and tells the facts that best suit his legislative agenda. That’s how politics work.
Very much appreciate your raising the issue about Pan being bought by pharma, Esq. Jaffe. Lack of evidence has been bugging me, too. Seems like the same-old same-old to me.