Legal Defense for for Ken Stoller is Now Active!
Here we go!
https://www.gofundme.com/legal-defense-fund-for-dr-kenneth-stoller
Rick Jaffe, Esq.
rickjaffeesquire@gmail.com
Here we go!
https://www.gofundme.com/legal-defense-fund-for-dr-kenneth-stoller
Rick Jaffe, Esq.
rickjaffeesquire@gmail.com
One thought on “Legal Defense for for Ken Stoller is Now Active!”
Don’t know if this pertains to your case, but…
Saw you post this the other day:
“For what it’s worth, I haven’t found a single direct precedent for a government agency using a public nuisance theory”
Don’t know how the law views it, but from a reason-based perspective, neither Stoller nor a child who was victimized by the measles are “nuisances”
Found this definition of nuisance on the web:
Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary
An activity or thing that affects the health, safety, or morals of a community
Things “affect” through action
Writing an exemption exempts a person from acting – in this case, not vaccinating is the non-action.
Not acting produces no effects and just filling out a form has no health effects, nor does it create a hazardous situation.
It simply allows the child to say “no” to being forced to protect himself from the extant hazard i.e., the measles.