Post Pre-Hearing Conference Update on Ken Stoller’s Medical Board Case
here it is: click on the update page https://gogetfunding.com/dr-ken-stoller-and-his-medically-vaccine-exempt-patients-need-your-help-again/ Rick Jaffe, Esq.
here it is: click on the update page https://gogetfunding.com/dr-ken-stoller-and-his-medically-vaccine-exempt-patients-need-your-help-again/ Rick Jaffe, Esq.
Like many, I have been following the battle by the vaccine concerned against New Jersey Legislature’s attempt to remove the religious exemption to childhood vaccination. Last year, New York removed religious exemptions by strong-arming one legislator to change his previously cast vote in opposition. In New Jersey, it’s coming down to a last-ditch compromise to carve out or preserve religious exemptions for families who can afford to send their children to private schools where the schools will allow/honor religious exemptions….
https://gogetfunding.com/dr-ken-stoller-and-his-medically-vaccine-exempt-patients-need-your-help-again/ Rick Jaffe Esq.
Today, the court granted the Medical Board’s Demurrer and dismissed the complaint against it. It was not entirely unexpected, per my previous update. https://wp.me/p7pwQD-Bs The basis of the decision is that since the Board now has an administrative action against Dr. Stoller, the issues raised in the civil suit should be initially addressed in the administrative proceeding. The decision is consistent with basically all prior attempts to pursue a civil lawsuit against an administrative agency during the pendancy of an…
Here is the most recent update on Ken Stoller’s civil lawsuit against the Medical Board (formerly against the San Francisco City Attorney). https://gogetfunding.com/blog-single-update/?blogpre=6112639&single=43538 Here is our response to the Board’s dismissal motion. ResponseDemurrerSAC Wish us luck! Rick Jaffe, Esq.
My prior post suggesting that people should calm down about AB 262 because the law does not directly affect the public might have been too subtle or maybe just too abstract. I indicated that what the state and county can do to people during public health crises is determined by other state and country laws and regulations, not AB 262. But again, that might have been too abstract. So let’s get into the roots of the weeds, so you can…
On October 19, the Governor signed AB 262 which deals with the responsibility of local health officials during a public health crisis due to a communicable disease. Here is the text of the new law: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB262 Many parents have expressed concern if not downright fear that their pets will be removed, or that quarantines will be imposed. I do not think the bill will significantly change things. However, the concern is understandable in light of the on-going negative PR campaign…
I get asked that alot these days. But, as I have said repeatedly in these posts, I can’t answer each family’s specific question about this, not even the families who have exemptions written by Ken Stoller (who I represent). So again, I won’t be answering any of your calls or messages about your child’s specific circumstances. Aside from my inability to deal with the shear volume of families who have questions, the reason I can’t answer specific questions or offer…
Here is the new update: Read the whole thing. We’re looking for the smoking gun! https://gogetfunding.com/blog-single-update/?blogpre=6112639&single=42135 Rick Jaffe, Esq.
Technically, regular California legislation takes effect on January 1, on the year following passage. Here is the Secretary of State language and URL about it. “A statute enacted during a regular session of the Legislature takes effect on January 1 of the following year, unless a later date is specified in the statute.” https://www.sos.ca.gov/administration/bill-chapters/ Therefore, SB 276/714 does not “take effect” until January 1, 2020 (and I’ve revised a prior post which suggested or stated otherwise). However, I don’t think…