Legal Defense for for Ken Stoller is Now Active!

Legal Defense for for Ken Stoller is Now Active!

Here we go!

Rick Jaffe, Esq.

One thought on “Legal Defense for for Ken Stoller is Now Active!

  1. Don’t know if this pertains to your case, but…

    Saw you post this the other day:

    “For what it’s worth, I haven’t found a single direct precedent for a government agency using a public nuisance theory”

    Don’t know how the law views it, but from a reason-based perspective, neither Stoller nor a child who was victimized by the measles are “nuisances”

    Found this definition of nuisance on the web:

    Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary
    An activity or thing that affects the health, safety, or morals of a community

    Things “affect” through action

    Writing an exemption exempts a person from acting – in this case, not vaccinating is the non-action.

    Not acting produces no effects and just filling out a form has no health effects, nor does it create a hazardous situation.

    It simply allows the child to say “no” to being forced to protect himself from the extant hazard i.e., the measles.

Leave a Reply to Robert Schecter Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *